Bill and invoice management
Create and update bills and invoices, correct the coding errors that stall approvals, and keep records matching reality, every change shown first.
BILL is where the money paperwork lives: the bills waiting on approval, the invoices waiting on clients, the vendor records that make both possible. It is also where two questions go to wait: what do we owe, and who owes us. Answering them means logging in, filtering, exporting, and repeating next week.
The BILL connector makes both questions instant. It links the AI you already use, like Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot, to your BILL account through Mad Fish Elements, with read and write reach across bills, vendors, customers, invoices, and payment records. The cash picture your finance flow already maintains becomes something the permitted people can simply ask.
Connect your account, and your AI reads the money paperwork end to end: bills with their statuses and due dates, the vendors behind them, invoices with their aging, the customers behind those, and the payment records that close the loop on both sides.
The standing questions become sentences; "What is due in the next 14 days?" returns the payables runway. "Which invoices are past due, by client, oldest first?" returns the receivables chase list. "What did we pay this vendor this year?" returns the relationship total. "Which bills are sitting unapproved?" returns the bottleneck; the cash conversation stops waiting on an export.
Context compounds on the Gateway: beside Workamajig and Toggl, the hours, the operations, and the money appear in one answer when the question spans them, which for agencies it usually does.
With Write access and your approval, your AI maintains the records that keep AP and AR moving:
Create and update bills and invoices, correct the coding errors that stall approvals, and keep records matching reality, every change shown first.
Maintain the master records cleanly, because half of AP pain is vendor-record drift.
Record vendor and customer payments so the books reflect what actually moved, on approval, in the audit trail.
The payables runway and receivables aging as scheduled briefs, so the weekly cash review starts answered.
The line that matters most on this page: recording and approving are different verbs from moving. Payment execution and approval authority stay inside BILL's own controls, with the people your finance policy names. The connector reads, prepares, records, and reports; the money-moving decisions stay exactly where your controls put them.
In practiceThe session finance teams standardize first: Friday morning, the scheduled brief arrives. Due next 14 days: totaled, largest five listed; past-due receivables: by client, aged, with the two crossing 60 days flagged. Bills awaiting approval: three, with how long they have waited. The cash call starts with everyone looking at the same picture. Someone asks, "What is our year spend with that vendor before we renew?" You ask; the answer lands mid-meeting, with the payment history behind it. The meeting decides things; the gathering already happened.
Payables and receivables briefs that arrive before the meeting that needs them.
Past-due invoices ranked and ready, so collections follow a list instead of a memory.
The bills waiting on humans, with wait times, surfaced weekly.
Relationship totals on demand, before the renewal call.
"What bills are due in the next two weeks, largest first?"Bill.com
The payables runway as a visual brief.
"Show past-due invoices by client, with days outstanding."Bill.com
The receivables chase list, aged and ranked.
"Which bills are waiting on approval, and for how long?"Bill.com
The bottleneck report that keeps AP moving.
"Record the $4,200 payment from Henderson against their March invoice."Bill.com
The books updated on approval, in the audit trail.
"Total our spend with the video vendor this year before the renewal call."Bill.com
The negotiation number, with history behind it.
Finance stops fielding "did that get paid" and "when is that due" one Slack at a time. The permitted people ask; the system of record answers; finance keeps the controls.
For marketing teamsCash timing is agency survival. The Friday brief, the chase list, and the vendor totals run themselves, and beside Workamajig on the Gateway, billing status meets project status in one view.
For agenciesAsk in chat and share the dashboard without building exports or taking screenshots.
Payables due and receivables expected, by week. Built for the Friday call.
Past-due by client and age band. Built for the collections push.
Totals and history by vendor. Built for renewals and budgeting.
The charts do the talking: bar for aging bands, line for cash timing, table-first for the record detail. And when leadership wants these anytime, the Data Visualization add-on turns your reports into always-current dashboards they open from a link. Ask in chat; share the dashboard.
Cash discipline lives in a few figures. Due in 14 days: the payables runway, totaled and ranked. Past-due receivables by age band: the chase list, ordered by urgency. Days waiting on approval: the internal bottleneck, measured instead of felt. Vendor spend year to date: the negotiation number, ready before the renewal call. And payment timing on both sides, because cash is a when question as much as a how-much question. The Friday brief carries the first three. The others answer on demand. Finance keeps every control and loses every gathering chore, which is the correct division of labor between people and connectors on a money system.
Day one: connect the account and read the runway. "Bills due in the next 14 days, largest first." Day two: read the other side. "Past-due invoices by client, aged." Day three: find the bottleneck. "Bills waiting on approval, with wait times." Route the list to the approvers. Day four: prep one negotiation. "Year-to-date spend with our biggest vendor." Day five: schedule the brief. "Friday mornings, send the cash picture." By Friday, the two standing questions of AP and AR answer themselves on schedule, the chase list is ranked instead of remembered, and the approval bottleneck is visible to the people who can clear it. Finance kept every control it had; it just stopped doing the gathering by hand.
Pair Bill.com with Workamajig so billing status meets project status, and with Toggl Track for the hours-to-invoice line. For agencies, the three together answer the only question that matters at month-end: did the work become cash, and when.
It will not move money. Payment execution and approval authority live inside BILL's controls with the humans your policy names; the connector prepares, records, and reports. It will not bypass approval chains or nudge them invisibly; it makes waiting bills visible to the people who should see them. It will not guess at amounts; every number is the record itself. And it will not touch accounts you did not connect.
Access is set per person, not per account, so Read seats see everything and change nothing while Write seats create and edit with your approval flow in front of every change. Delete access goes only to people you trust to clean up, and many teams start read-only, check answers against the platform, then widen access as the audit trail earns it.
You choose the level of human review and can change it at any time, while every action records what changed, when, and who approved it. Per-user access means Elements never stores your Bill.com password, and your data is never harvested or resold.
Plans, account limits, and the multi-client Agency plan are on the pricing page .
No; it can create, update, and record, on approval, in the audit trail. Executing payments stays inside BILL with your designated approvers, which is exactly where your auditors want it.
Finance and the leaders who need cash visibility, on Read; the finance staff who maintain records, on Write. Per-person permissions make that split real, and most tenants keep this connector's access narrower than the marketing ones.
BILL's own accounting integrations keep doing that job. The connector adds the conversational layer on top of BILL, and the records it maintains flow through your existing sync like any others.
No. Your AI acts only with the permissions you set, and changes follow the review level you choose. Read-only seats cannot change anything, because the approval flow is the product working as designed.
Your team can use Claude, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot, while other AI tools can likely connect when they support MCP, the open standard for linking AI assistants to outside tools.
No. Your data stays yours, so nothing is harvested and nothing is resold.
The teams winning with AI are not handing their accounts to a black box; they keep the strategy and delegate the hands-on-keyboard work, while approvals and an audit trail make it safe to move fast. Connect the account you already have through the Gateway and ask the question you would normally build a report to answer.
Your first 14 days are free. Add your card to start, and cancel before the trial ends to pay nothing.